附上链接
https://www.zhihu.com/answer/2434665402

The two other Hun period samples KMT-2785 and ASZK-1 were located in the middle of our PCA clines (Fig. 2andExtended Data Fig 1a), and accordingly they could be modelled from European and Asian ancestors. The best passing models for KMT-2785 predicted 76% Late Xiongnu and 24% local EU_Core, while alternative model showed 86% Sarmatian12and 14% Xiongnu ancestries (Supplementary Table 5c). Both models implicate Sarmatians as in the Late Xiongnus of the first model 46-52% Sarmatian and 48-54% Ulaanzuukh_SlabGrave components had been predicted14. The ASZK-1 genome formed a clade with Sarmatians in nearly all models. The rest of the Hun period samples map to the northern half of the EU cline, nevertheless two of these (SEI-1 and SEI-5) could be modelled from ~70% EU_Core and 30% Sarmatian components. The prevalent Sarmatian ancestry in 4 Hun period samples, implies significant Sarmatian influence on European Huns.

MSG-1和VZ-12673两个数据与Kurayly Hun和天山匈奴纯亚洲的数据组成的Hun_Asia_Core模组来推断王族迁徙……

大体看了一下，MSG-1和VZ-12673两个数据与Kurayly Hun和天山匈奴的纯亚洲的数据组成的Hun_Asia_Core模组仅仅是推断出无whg，以及可能和匈奴有亲缘关系。到他这就王族王族迁徙了？
完全不提KMT-2785的替代模型显示 86% 的萨尔马提亚和 14% 的匈奴血统。而闭口不谈SEI-1 和 SEI-5两个样本可以得出 70% 的 EU_Core 和 30% 的萨尔马提亚成分。样本中普遍存在的萨尔马提亚血统。
而且人家第一段就说了：
Aside from the immigrant core groups we identified that the majority of the individuals from each period were local residents, harboring “native European” ancestry.